Replacing grown systems without downtime
In practice we keep seeing the same mistake again and again. A case from the last few months makes it concrete. The first idea is understandable, but it usually ends up costing more. A case from the last few months shows this well.
It takes longer, but it can be reversed at any point. It takes longer, but it stays predictable. We proceed incrementally: measure first, then rebuild.
An example from a recent project shows this well. We work in small steps instead: measure first, then change. It looks slower, but it can be reversed at any point.
We proceed incrementally: measure first, then rebuild. It takes longer, but it stays predictable. An example from a recent project shows this well.
The instinct is reasonable, but it usually ends up costing more. An example from a recent project makes it concrete.
Latest news